THE BEELZEBUB 'CODE' PART II

Modern and popular fiction writers have composed some 'best' & 'better' selling novels that employ the 'eye-catching' word: "CODE".

The word 'code' goes from 'Morse ' to 'DA VINCI' with a controversial amount of 'fact' and 'fancy'.
Eager readers of all ages who delve into 'ancient secrets' & 'arcane lore' , whether or not 'on a midnight dark and dreary', will also be most pleased to learn that THE TALES OF BEELZEBUB is  'CODE' !

Before raising the usual eyebrows and rejecting this conjecture and statement, permit me  to give some vague hints as to why this may well be so and also why it is not readily apparent to 'diehard'
'GURDJIEFFIANS' and all the offshoots ,including, but not limited to,    'OUSPENSKIANS'.

But this will require a series of things that will take time to post. Even then, not everyone will agree or understand why or accept these 'claims' and 'hints'.

'THE TALES' can be called 'THE BEELZEBUB CODE'.

A 'code', like a lock, requires a 'key', a method that allows its deciphering or 'cracking' ,somewhat analogous to 'safe-cracking' as writers, archeologists, and occultist-alchemists-etc realize as they pour over symbols and hieroglyphics to 'unlock forbidden secrets', which are apt to be 'encoded'-to be read only by those who know how and can decipher it, and so, the code must not be obvious or easy to figure out, even if 'hints' and 'clues' are given that may actually help, rather than divert attention and trick, or obviously mislead, those 'code-breakers' attempting such feats, that can be most 'mind-boggling' at their very best.

Now the question arises why should an 'obvious work of literature' require an 'encoding' in the first place? A short answer is to hide the actual author of the work, as in the long-debated notions and similar conjectures, that Sir Francis Bacon wrote Shakespeare's plays or that Christopher Marlowe did, etc.

If we look at certain 'scriptures' we encounter not only the problems of interpretation(s) but of 'authorship' or 'apostolic' succession, etc. The libraries are full of such works for the BIBLE, the KORAN, the UPANISHADS, THE BHAGAVAD GITA, THE BOOK OF MORMON, the URANTIA, and also the DEAD SEA SCROLLS. And many of these objects, parchments, records, etc have received rather intense 'scientific'  scrutiny and  'research' or 'testing' of all kinds.

Still people can read all or none of the versions and translations and the special interpretations and go on living their ordinary lives( of pleasure and pain) and allow these volumes and so on to gather more dust on shelves than they now do.

Still, the writers of such 'inspirationally enlightening' works would like readers of these 'can't put down occult and sometimes supernatural thrillers' to have 'a peek' at their 'creations'.

HOWEVER, ' THE TALES OF BEELZEBUB TO HIS GRANDSON' might outweigh all of' this current literary frenzy' to reveal the various codes found in exotic and esoteric realms if taken up and read with an' awareness and intent', a 'conscious aim' if one is capable of doing this.